flowchart TB T[Top Management<br/>Strategy, Policy, Vision] --> M[Middle Management<br/>Translation, Coordination] M --> L[Lower Management<br/>Supervision, Execution] style T fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#AD1457 style M fill:#FFF8E1,stroke:#F9A825 style L fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#2E7D32
1 Management: Concept, Process, Theories and Approaches
1.1 What is Management?
Management is the work of getting things done through other people. The classroom definition is widely associated with Mary Parker Follett — “the art of getting things done through people” — but the modern textbook treatment is more exact. Harold Koontz and Heinz Weihrich define management as “the process of designing and maintaining an environment in which individuals, working together in groups, efficiently accomplish selected aims” (koontz2010?). Stephen Robbins and Mary Coulter define it as “coordinating and overseeing the work activities of others so that their activities are completed efficiently and effectively” (robbins2018?).
Two ideas sit inside every working definition.
| Test | Question it answers | Cue |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | Are we doing things right? Output per unit of input. | “Means” — minimising waste of resources |
| Effectiveness | Are we doing the right things? Goal attainment. | “Ends” — achieving organisational objectives |
Peter Drucker captured the contrast in a single line: “Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things” (drucker1973?). Good management is high on both — but when the two pull apart, effectiveness comes first. A perfectly efficient operation that builds the wrong product is a costlier failure than an inefficient operation that builds the right one.
| Author | Working definition | What it foregrounds |
|---|---|---|
| Henri Fayol | “To manage is to forecast and plan, to organise, to command, to coordinate and to control” | Functions / process |
| F.W. Taylor | “Knowing exactly what you want men to do and then seeing that they do it in the best and cheapest way” | Efficiency and method |
| Mary Parker Follett | “The art of getting things done through people” | Human element |
| George R. Terry | “A distinct process consisting of planning, organising, actuating and controlling, performed to determine and accomplish stated objectives by the use of human beings and other resources” | Process |
| Peter Drucker | “A multipurpose organ that manages a business, manages managers, and manages workers and work” | Multidimensional role |
| Koontz & Weihrich | “The process of designing and maintaining an environment in which individuals working together accomplish selected aims efficiently” | Environment design |
1.1.1 Characteristics of Management
Management is goal-oriented, pervasive, multidimensional, continuous, group activity, dynamic, intangible, and both science and art. It is goal-oriented because every managerial act is justified by some end. It is pervasive because it is needed in every organised effort — business, government, hospital, school, NGO. It is continuous — once a plan is executed, the next is already being shaped. It is intangible — its presence is felt through results, not seen directly.
1.2 Management — Science, Art, or Profession?
The question is older than the discipline itself, and NTA stems often hinge on which feature is being foregrounded.
| Lens | Defining trait | Why management qualifies | Why only partly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Science | Systematic body of knowledge, cause–effect, universally testable | Has principles (Fayol’s 14), tested theories, replicable findings | Human behaviour resists exact prediction; results vary by context |
| Art | Personalised application of knowledge for a desired result | Requires judgment, creativity, practice; same situation handled differently by two managers | Rests on a body of knowledge — not pure intuition |
| Profession | Specialised knowledge, formal training, code of ethics, service motive, restricted entry | Formal qualifications (MBA), institutes (AIMA), codes of conduct | Entry not legally restricted; many practising managers have no formal management qualification |
The accepted compromise is that management is an inexact science and a practising art — and a developing profession whose status has risen but is not yet fully closed in the way medicine or law is.
1.3 Levels of Management
Authority is layered. Three levels are recognised in every textbook.
| Level | Typical titles | Time horizon | Dominant skill |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top (Strategic) | Board, CEO, MD, President | Long-range (3–10 years) | Conceptual |
| Middle (Tactical) | Departmental heads, Plant manager, Regional manager | Medium-range (1–3 years) | Human + Conceptual |
| Lower / Supervisory (Operational) | Foreman, Section officer, Team leader | Short-range (days–months) | Technical + Human |
Robert Katz’s classification of managerial skills — technical, human, conceptual — maps neatly onto these levels: technical skill is most needed at the bottom, conceptual at the top, while human skill matters at every level (katz1974?).
1.4 Management as a Process
Treating management as a process means viewing it as a connected sequence of activities rather than a collection of one-off acts. Henri Fayol’s classic listing — plan, organise, command, coordinate, control — was tightened by Luther Gulick and Lyndall Urwick into the mnemonic POSDCORB: Planning, Organising, Staffing, Directing, Co-ordinating, Reporting, Budgeting (gulickurwick1937?). Modern textbooks (Koontz, Robbins) settle on five functions: planning, organising, staffing, leading/directing, controlling.
flowchart LR P[Planning<br/>Set objectives,<br/>choose course] --> O[Organising<br/>Group tasks,<br/>assign authority] O --> S[Staffing<br/>Recruit, train,<br/>develop people] S --> D[Directing<br/>Lead, motivate,<br/>communicate] D --> C[Controlling<br/>Measure, correct,<br/>feedback] C -. Feedback .-> P style P fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0 style C fill:#F1F8E9,stroke:#558B2F
Each function is detailed in the next chapter. The dotted line back to planning makes management a closed-loop activity — the output of control feeds the next round of planning.
1.5 Theories and Approaches: A Map
Management thought has evolved in three broad waves.
| Wave | Period | Pre-occupation | Representative thinkers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical | 1880s–1930s | Efficiency of work and structure | Taylor, the Gilbreths, Gantt, Fayol, Weber |
| Neo-classical / Behavioural | 1930s–1950s | The human side of work | Mayo (Hawthorne), Maslow, McGregor, Herzberg, Likert |
| Modern | 1950s–present | Wholeness, fit, and quantitative rigour | Bertalanffy, Lawrence & Lorsch, Fiedler, Simon, Drucker |
1.5.1 Classical Approach
The classical school treated the organisation as a machine to be tuned for output. It split into three streams.
| Stream | Originator | Core idea | Signature output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scientific Management | F.W. Taylor (1911) | Find the one best way through time-and-motion study; pay by output | Principles of Scientific Management; differential piece-rate |
| Administrative Management | Henri Fayol (1916) | Universal principles for managing the whole organisation | 14 principles; 5 functions |
| Bureaucratic Management | Max Weber (1922) | Rational-legal authority through rules, hierarchy, impersonality | The “ideal-type” bureaucracy |
Taylor’s four principles. (i) develop a science for each element of work; (ii) scientifically select and train the worker; (iii) cooperate with workers to ensure the science is followed; (iv) divide work and responsibility almost equally between management and workers (taylor1911?). Frank and Lillian Gilbreth refined the method through therbligs — elementary motions catalogued for analysis. Henry Gantt added the visual scheduling tool that still bears his name.
Fayol’s 14 principles range from division of work and unity of command to esprit de corps and equity (fayol1949?). They are general guides, not laws.
| # | Principle | One-line idea |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Division of Work | Specialisation raises efficiency |
| 2 | Authority and Responsibility | Right to command + obligation to perform |
| 3 | Discipline | Obedience to agreements |
| 4 | Unity of Command | One subordinate, one boss |
| 5 | Unity of Direction | One head, one plan for one objective |
| 6 | Subordination of Individual Interest | Common good above private good |
| 7 | Remuneration | Fair pay to all |
| 8 | Centralisation | Right balance between centre and periphery |
| 9 | Scalar Chain | Clear line of authority top to bottom |
| 10 | Order | A place for everything; everything in its place |
| 11 | Equity | Kindliness and justice |
| 12 | Stability of Tenure | Reduce turnover; develop people |
| 13 | Initiative | Encourage employees to think and act |
| 14 | Esprit de Corps | Build harmony and unity |
Weber’s bureaucracy rests on rules, hierarchy, division of labour, technical competence, written records and impersonality. The aim was to replace charismatic and traditional authority — both unstable — with rational-legal authority (weber1947?).
1.5.2 Neo-classical / Behavioural Approach
The Hawthorne studies (1924–32) at Western Electric, led eventually by Elton Mayo, found that worker productivity rose under almost any change in lighting, breaks or supervision. The interpretation — people respond to attention and to social belonging more than to physical conditions — opened the human relations movement (mayo1933?). Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, Douglas McGregor’s Theory X / Theory Y, Frederick Herzberg’s two-factor theory and Rensis Likert’s four systems of management followed and are taken up later in this chapter and in the OB chapter.
1.5.3 Modern Approaches
| Approach | Core proposition | Signature insight |
|---|---|---|
| Systems | The organisation is an open system that takes inputs, transforms them, and exchanges outputs with its environment | Synergy; sub-systems interact; boundary management matters |
| Contingency | There is no one best way — the right structure / style depends on the situation | Lawrence & Lorsch’s differentiation–integration; Fiedler’s leadership contingency |
| Quantitative / Management Science | Use mathematical models, statistics and OR for decision problems | Linear programming, queueing theory, simulation, decision trees |
Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s General Systems Theory (1968) supplied the language of inputs, throughputs, outputs and feedback. The contingency view — “it depends” — was a corrective to the universalism of Taylor and Fayol. The quantitative school grew out of the operations-research work of the Second World War.
flowchart LR C[Classical<br/>Efficiency<br/>Taylor · Fayol · Weber] --> N[Neo-classical<br/>Human side<br/>Mayo · Maslow · McGregor] N --> M[Modern<br/>Wholeness & fit<br/>Systems · Contingency · Quantitative] style C fill:#FFEBEE,stroke:#C62828 style N fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#EF6C00 style M fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#1B5E20
A useful frame for the exam is Harold Koontz’s “management theory jungle” — Koontz catalogued the many overlapping schools and warned that the discipline risked confusion unless integrated (koontz1961?). The contingency and systems views are read as steps toward that integration.
1.6 Practice Questions
Who defined management as "the art of getting things done through people"?
View solution
Match the thinker with the contribution:
| (i) | F.W. Taylor | (a) | 14 principles of management |
| (ii) | Henri Fayol | (b) | Bureaucracy |
| (iii) | Max Weber | (c) | Scientific management |
| (iv) | Elton Mayo | (d) | Hawthorne studies |
View solution
"Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things." The contrast is associated with:
View solution
Which level of management requires the highest conceptual skill in Katz's classification?
View solution
The expansion of POSDCORB does not include:
View solution
The Hawthorne experiments are most directly associated with the rise of:
View solution
Which of the following is not one of Fayol's 14 principles?
View solution
The "management theory jungle" was a phrase coined by:
View solution
- Management is goal-directed coordination of work, judged on efficiency (means) and effectiveness (ends). Drucker’s line: doing things right vs doing the right things.
- Three lenses: Science, Art, Profession. Settled view — inexact science, practising art, developing profession.
- Three levels: Top–Middle–Lower. Katz: Technical skill at bottom, Conceptual at top, Human throughout.
- Process functions (POSDCORB): Planning, Organising, Staffing, Directing, CO-ordinating, Reporting, Budgeting.
- Three waves of theory: Classical (Taylor, Fayol, Weber) → Neo-classical (Mayo, Maslow, McGregor) → Modern (Systems, Contingency, Quantitative).
- Fayol — 14 principles, 5 functions. Taylor — one best way. Weber — rational-legal authority.