flowchart LR N[NI: WACC ↓ as debt ↑] --- T[Traditional: WACC ↓ then ↑] T --- M[MM: WACC unchanged<br/>without taxes] M --- TO[Trade-off: optimum at<br/>tax shield = distress cost] style N fill:#FFEBEE,stroke:#C62828 style T fill:#FFF8E1,stroke:#F9A825 style M fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0 style TO fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#2E7D32
42 Capital Structure and Cost of Capital
42.1 What is Capital Structure?
Capital structure is the mix of long-term sources of finance — equity, retained earnings, preference shares, debentures and term loans — used by a firm to fund its operations and growth. It is the financing-decision output: once managers have decided how much the firm needs, capital structure decides where it comes from.
Two often-confused terms:
| Term | What it includes |
|---|---|
| Capital structure | Long-term sources only — equity + reserves + preference + long-term debt |
| Financial structure | All liabilities — long-term + current liabilities (= the right-hand side of the balance sheet) |
I.M. Pandey defines capital structure as “the proportion of debt and equity capital in the long-term financing of a firm” (pandey2021?). Brealey-Myers-Allen’s compact form: “Capital structure refers to the firm’s mix of debt and equity” (brealeymyers2020?).
42.1.1 Patterns of capital structure
| Pattern | Composition |
|---|---|
| All-equity | Only equity shares + retained earnings — no debt |
| Equity + Debt | Equity + long-term loans / debentures |
| Equity + Preference + Debt | All three components |
| Highly leveraged | Debt-heavy mix |
42.2 Cost of Capital
The cost of capital is the minimum rate of return that a firm must earn on its investments to leave the value of equity unchanged. It is the opportunity cost of capital — the return investors could have earned on alternatives of similar risk (khanjain2020?; pandey2021?).
| Author | Definition |
|---|---|
| Solomon Ezra | “Minimum required earnings rate or the cut-off rate of capital expenditure.” |
| Hampton | “Rate of return the firm requires from investment in order to increase the value of the firm in the marketplace.” |
| Khan & Jain | “The discount rate used to evaluate the desirability of investment proposals.” |
42.2.1 Components — cost of each source
A firm’s overall cost of capital is the weighted average of the costs of its individual sources.
| Source | Standard formula | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of debt (\(K_d\)) | \(K_d = \dfrac{I (1-t)}{NP}\) | After-tax; interest is tax-deductible. I = interest, t = tax rate, NP = net proceeds |
| Cost of preference (\(K_p\)) | \(K_p = \dfrac{D_p}{NP}\) | Dividend ÷ Net Proceeds; not tax-deductible |
| Cost of equity (\(K_e\)) — Dividend approach | \(K_e = \dfrac{D_1}{P_0} + g\) | Gordon’s growth model |
| Cost of equity (\(K_e\)) — CAPM | \(K_e = R_f + \beta (R_m - R_f)\) | Risk-based |
| Cost of retained earnings (\(K_r\)) | Slightly less than \(K_e\) | No floatation cost |
42.2.2 Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
\[\text{WACC} = K_e \cdot \frac{E}{V} + K_p \cdot \frac{P}{V} + K_d (1-t) \cdot \frac{D}{V}\]
where \(V = E + P + D\). Two weighting schemes:
| Approach | Weights based on | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Book-value weights | Balance-sheet figures | Simple; can lag market reality |
| Market-value weights | Market capitalisation, market value of debt | Theoretically correct |
WACC is the firm’s hurdle rate — projects must earn at least WACC to be value-creating.
42.3 Capital Structure Theories
Four theories explain whether capital structure matters for firm value.
| Theory | Core claim | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Net Income (NI) approach — Durand | Capital structure matters. As debt rises, WACC falls and value rises | Optimal: 100% debt |
| Net Operating Income (NOI) approach — Durand | Capital structure does not matter. WACC is independent of mix | No optimal point |
| Traditional approach | Capital structure matters up to a point. WACC has a U-shape; optimal at moderate debt | One optimal capital structure |
| Modigliani-Miller (MM) — without taxes | Value is independent of structure (Proposition I); cost of equity rises with leverage (Proposition II) | No optimal — no taxes |
| Modigliani-Miller (MM) — with taxes | With tax-deductible interest, value rises with debt | Optimal: maximum debt |
42.3.1 MM Propositions (1958, 1963)
MM Proposition I (no taxes): \(V_L = V_U\) — the value of a levered firm equals the value of an unlevered firm. Capital structure is irrelevant.
MM Proposition II (no taxes): \(K_e = K_o + (K_o - K_d) \cdot \dfrac{D}{E}\) — the cost of equity rises linearly with the debt-equity ratio.
MM with taxes (1963): \(V_L = V_U + tD\) — interest tax shield raises the value of the levered firm. The implication is maximise debt — which is unrealistic.
The MM model rests on perfect-market assumptions (no taxes, no bankruptcy costs, no information asymmetry). Relaxing these gives the trade-off theory and the pecking-order theory.
| Theory | Core claim |
|---|---|
| Trade-off theory | Optimal capital structure balances tax shield (raises value) against bankruptcy and agency costs (lower value) |
| Pecking-order theory (Myers) | Firms prefer internal funds > debt > new equity because of information asymmetry; no target debt-equity ratio |
42.4 Optimal Capital Structure
The optimal capital structure is the mix that minimises the firm’s WACC and maximises the value of equity. In the trade-off view, it sits where the marginal benefit of the tax shield equals the marginal cost of financial distress.
42.5 Factors Affecting Capital Structure
| Family | Factors |
|---|---|
| Internal | Size, profitability, asset structure, growth, risk attitude of management |
| External | Tax environment, legal regulation, market conditions, interest rates, credit-rating |
| Cost considerations | Cost of debt vs cost of equity; floatation cost |
| Risk considerations | Operating leverage, cash-flow stability, financial distress |
| Control | Equity dilution, voting control |
| Industry | Industry norms; capital intensity |
42.6 Practice Questions
Capital structure refers to the mix of:
View solution
Modigliani & Miller's Proposition I (no taxes) states that:
View solution
When corporate taxes are introduced, MM (1963) shows that the value of a levered firm equals:
View solution
A firm has an irredeemable debenture that pays 12% interest. If the corporate tax rate is 30%, the after-tax cost of debt is:
View solution
According to Myers's pecking-order theory of capital structure, firms prefer financing in the order:
View solution
A firm's expected dividend is ₹4 per share, the current market price is ₹50, and the constant growth rate is 5%. The cost of equity, by Gordon's model, is:
View solution
A firm's WACC is most usefully described as:
View solution
In Durand's Net Operating Income (NOI) approach to capital structure:
View solution
- Capital structure = mix of long-term sources of finance. Financial structure adds current liabilities.
- Cost of capital = minimum rate of return on investments to leave value unchanged. Sources: \(K_d\) after tax, \(K_p\), \(K_e\) (Gordon or CAPM), \(K_r\).
- WACC = weighted average of component costs. Use market-value weights for theory; book-value for simplicity.
- Theories: NI (Durand) — debt always good; NOI (Durand) — irrelevant; Traditional — U-shape with optimum; MM (1958) without taxes — irrelevant; MM (1963) with taxes — VL = VU + tD; Trade-off — tax shield vs distress; Pecking order (Myers) — internal → debt → new equity.
- MM Proposition II: \(K_e = K_o + (K_o - K_d)(D/E)\) — cost of equity rises linearly with leverage.
- Optimal structure: mix that minimises WACC and maximises firm value. Determined by tax, distress, agency, control, market and industry factors.