flowchart LR S1[Strategy] --- ST[Structure] ST --- SY[Systems] S1 --- SV[Shared Values] SV --- ST SV --- SY SV --- SK[Skills] SK --- STY[Style] STY --- SF[Staff] SF --- SK style SV fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#AD1457 style S1 fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0
56 Strategy Implementation
56.1 What is Strategy Implementation?
Strategy implementation is the process of converting a chosen strategy into action through structure, systems, processes, people and culture. The often-quoted Bossidy and Charan line: “execution is the discipline of getting things done” (bossidycharan2002?). Thompson, Strickland and Gamble’s textbook position: “a brilliant strategy + lousy execution = mediocre performance” (thompson2020?).
Implementation is what most strategy projects under-deliver on. Empirical research consistently finds that 70 per cent of strategies fail in execution, not in formulation. Strategy is therefore as much about doing as about deciding.
| Author | Definition | What it foregrounds |
|---|---|---|
| Thompson, Strickland & Gamble | “Converting strategic plans into actions and results — building the right organisation, deploying resources, leading change.” | Action |
| Bossidy & Charan | “Execution is the discipline of getting things done — a systematic process of rigorously discussing the hows and whats, questioning, following through, and ensuring accountability.” | Discipline |
| Hrebiniak | “Strategy implementation is what happens after the strategy has been formulated — managing change, structure, culture, incentives.” | Change |
56.1.1 Formulation vs Implementation
| Feature | Formulation | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Question | What should we do? | How do we make it happen? |
| Position | Before action | During and after action |
| Skill | Analytical | Managerial — leadership, change, motivation |
| Owners | Senior leaders | All managers, all levels |
| Time | Short bursts | Continuous |
| Risks | Wrong choice | Slow, partial, abandoned |
56.2 Frameworks for Implementation
Three classical frameworks frame the implementation challenge.
56.2.1 McKinsey 7-S Framework
Already met in topic 30 (Change Management). The McKinsey 7-S framework — Pascale, Athos, Peters and Waterman — argues that all seven elements must align for strategy to work (petersWaterman1982?):
| Element | Type | What it captures |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy | Hard | The chosen plan |
| Structure | Hard | Organisation chart and reporting |
| Systems | Hard | Processes, IT, controls |
| Shared values | Soft | Core values, culture |
| Style | Soft | Leadership style |
| Staff | Soft | Workforce capabilities |
| Skills | Soft | Distinctive competencies |
The soft 4-S — shared values, style, staff, skills — are typically the harder, slower-to-change elements that derail implementation.
56.2.2 Galbraith’s Star Model
Jay Galbraith’s Star Model identifies five elements that must be aligned with strategy (galbraith2002?): Strategy, Structure, Processes, Reward, People.
56.2.3 Strategy-Implementation Sequence (Hrebiniak)
Lawrence Hrebiniak’s framework for implementation (hrebiniak2013?):
| Driver | What it ensures |
|---|---|
| Sound strategy | Implementation cannot rescue a flawed strategy |
| Clear objectives | Strategic objectives translated to operating goals |
| Aligned structure | Structure follows strategy (Chandler) |
| Coordination | Across functions and levels |
| Culture & change management | The “soft” enablers |
| Incentives | Motivate the right behaviour |
| Leadership and execution rigour | Bossidy & Charan’s discipline |
56.3 The Five Pillars of Strategy Execution
A practical Indian-textbook synthesis lists five pillars of execution, each of which can derail a strategy if neglected:
| Pillar | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Structure | Match structure to strategy |
| Systems and processes | Information, decision rights, planning, reward |
| Resources | Capital, people, technology |
| Leadership and culture | Tone at the top; behaviours that match the strategy |
| Communication and change | Make the strategy visible and understood |
56.3.1 Structure follows strategy
Alfred Chandler’s classic proposition (1962) — when firms diversify, structure shifts from functional to divisional / SBU form to handle the new complexity (chandler1962?). The corollary: a wrong structure can quietly defeat the right strategy.
56.3.2 Culture follows — and shapes — strategy
Schein’s three-level culture model (Topic 19) becomes critical here. Culture eats strategy for breakfast — Peter Drucker’s well-known line — captures the point that beliefs and habits shape what gets done.
56.4 Balanced Scorecard for Strategy Execution
Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard (Topic 27) is widely used for cascading strategy into execution. The Strategy Map describes cause-and-effect across four perspectives — Learning & Growth → Internal Process → Customer → Financial. Each perspective gets objectives, measures, targets, and initiatives — turning the strategy into a measurable implementation plan.
56.5 OKRs for Execution
Objectives and Key Results (Andy Grove → John Doerr → Google) — Topic 29 — provide a quarterly cadence for execution. Three properties make OKRs effective:
| Property | What it ensures |
|---|---|
| Ambitious | Stretch goals (target ~70 per cent achievement) |
| Measurable | Key results are objective and quantifiable |
| Transparent | Visible across the organisation |
56.6 Change Management for Implementation
Most strategy implementation involves change — and the change-management frameworks from topic 30 directly apply.
| Tool | What it does | Anchor |
|---|---|---|
| Lewin’s three-step | Unfreeze → Change → Refreeze | Lewin (1947) |
| Kotter’s eight steps | Urgency → Coalition → Vision → Communicate → Empower → Wins → Consolidate → Anchor | Kotter (1996) |
| Beckhard’s formula | C = D × V × F > R | Beckhard |
| ADKAR | Awareness → Desire → Knowledge → Ability → Reinforcement | Prosci |
A useful synthesis: Kotter’s 8 steps + Lewin’s 3 — steps 1–4 unfreeze, 5–6 change, 7–8 refreeze.
56.7 Common Reasons Strategy Implementation Fails
| Cause | Description |
|---|---|
| Vague strategy | Not specific enough to drive action |
| Lack of leadership commitment | Senior leaders not modelling the change |
| Poor communication | Front-line employees don’t know the strategy |
| Misaligned structure | Old structure cannot deliver the new strategy |
| Wrong incentives | People rewarded for old behaviour |
| Resource constraints | Budgets and headcount not aligned |
| Cultural resistance | “We’ve always done it this way” |
| Insufficient measurement | No tracking, no accountability |
56.8 Strategic Control and Evaluation
Strategy implementation must be monitored. The four classical types of strategic control (thompson2020?):
| Type | What it monitors | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Premise control | Are the assumptions behind the strategy still true? | Environmental scanning |
| Implementation control | Is the strategy being executed as planned? | Milestone reviews |
| Strategic surveillance | What’s happening that we did not expect? | Open-ended scanning |
| Special-alert control | Sudden, high-impact events | Crisis management |
56.9 Practice Questions
Strategy implementation is best described as:
View solution
"Execution is the discipline of getting things done" is associated with:
View solution
In the McKinsey 7-S framework, which is one of the *soft* 4-S elements?
View solution
"Structure follows strategy" is the proposition of:
View solution
"Culture eats strategy for breakfast" — emphasising that culture is essential to implementation — is famously attributed to:
View solution
Monitoring whether the assumptions on which the strategy was based remain valid is called:
View solution
In the Kaplan-Norton Balanced Scorecard, the *cause-and-effect* in a strategy map runs:
View solution
Galbraith's "Star Model" of organisation design includes which five elements?
View solution
- Strategy implementation = converting strategy into action. 70%+ of strategies fail in execution, not formulation.
- Bossidy-Charan: execution is the discipline of getting things done.
- Frameworks: McKinsey 7-S (hard 3 + soft 4), Galbraith Star Model (Strategy-Structure-Processes-Reward-People), Hrebiniak’s drivers.
- Five pillars of execution: structure, systems & processes, resources, leadership & culture, communication & change.
- Chandler: structure follows strategy. Drucker: culture eats strategy for breakfast.
- Balanced Scorecard for cascading strategy. OKRs for quarterly cadence.
- Change management for implementation: Lewin’s 3 steps, Kotter’s 8 steps, Beckhard’s formula, ADKAR.
- Four types of strategic control: premise · implementation · strategic surveillance · special-alert.