flowchart LR S[Sender / Source<br/>has an idea] --> E[Encoding<br/>idea → symbols] E --> M[Message] M --> CH[Channel<br/>medium] CH --> D[Decoding<br/>symbols → idea] D --> R[Receiver] R -. Feedback .-> S N[(Noise)] -. interferes .-> CH style S fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0 style R fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#1B5E20 style N fill:#FFEBEE,stroke:#C62828
3 Communication: Types, Process and Barriers
3.1 What is Communication?
Communication is the transfer and understanding of meaning (robbins2018?). The two italicised words matter equally. Transfer without understanding is just noise; understanding without transfer is private cognition. Stephen Robbins distinguishes communication from mere talking by insisting that the message must reach the receiver in a form the receiver can interpret.
Koontz and Weihrich treat communication as the blood-stream of an organisation — the medium through which planning, organising, staffing, directing and controlling happen (koontz2010?). Chester Barnard went further, arguing in The Functions of the Executive that the first function of an executive is to develop and maintain a system of communication (barnard1938?).
| Author | Definition | What it foregrounds |
|---|---|---|
| Louis Allen | “The sum of all the things one person does when he wants to create understanding in the mind of another. It involves a systematic and continuous process of telling, listening and understanding.” | Two-way, continuous |
| Keith Davis | “The process of passing information and understanding from one person to another.” | Information + understanding |
| Newman & Summer | “An exchange of facts, ideas, opinions or emotions by two or more persons.” | Exchange |
3.2 Process of Communication
The Shannon–Weaver model (1949) — borrowed from telecommunications — supplies the canonical seven-element schema (shannonweaver1949?). David Berlo’s S-M-C-R model (1960) tightened it for the social sciences (berlo1960?).
| Element | Role | Failure mode |
|---|---|---|
| Sender (Source) | Originates the idea | Unclear thinking, hidden agenda |
| Encoding | Converts idea into symbols (words, images, gestures) | Wrong vocabulary, jargon |
| Message | The encoded content | Ambiguous, too long, wrong order |
| Channel | The medium that carries it (voice, email, video) | Poor reach, wrong medium for the message |
| Decoding | Receiver re-converts symbols into meaning | Different frame of reference |
| Receiver | Person for whom the message is meant | Inattention, hostility, fatigue |
| Feedback | Receiver’s response to the sender | Absent, delayed, distorted |
Noise — anything that interferes at any step — sits across the model rather than at one point. Without feedback, communication is one-way information but not yet a closed communication.
3.3 Types of Communication
3.3.1 By organisational direction
| Direction | Flow | Typical content | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Downward | Top → bottom | Instructions, policies, performance feedback | CEO’s all-hands address |
| Upward | Bottom → top | Reports, suggestions, grievances | Daily production report |
| Horizontal / Lateral | Across same level | Coordination, problem-solving | Marketing speaks to operations |
| Diagonal / Crosswise | Across levels and departments | Speed, problem-solving | Junior engineer emails the VP–Sales directly |
3.3.2 Formal vs informal
Formal communication follows the official lines of authority laid down in the organisation chart. Informal communication — the grapevine — runs along social rather than positional lines. Keith Davis (1953) identified four grapevine patterns:
| Pattern | How it spreads | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Single strand | A → B → C → D → … in a chain | One-to-one rumour relay |
| Gossip | One person tells everyone else | “Have you heard…” at the canteen |
| Probability | Random — anyone tells anyone | Casual leakage |
| Cluster | A few tell selected others, who in turn tell selected others | Most common in organisations |
The grapevine is not all bad: research repeatedly shows it is fast and often accurate on routine matters; managers who try to suppress it usually fail. The textbook prescription is to understand and use the grapevine rather than fight it.
3.3.3 Verbal, Non-verbal and Written
| Form | Modes | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral / Verbal | Face-to-face talk, telephone, video call | Speed, instant feedback, tone | No record, can be forgotten |
| Written | Letter, memo, e-mail, report, manual | Permanence, can be re-read, legal weight | Slow, lacks tone, misinterpretation |
| Non-verbal | Facial expression, gesture, posture, eye contact, silence, dress | Carries emotion, often involuntary | Easy to misread across cultures |
Albert Mehrabian’s much-quoted 7–38–55 rule — that 7 per cent of meaning in feeling-and-attitude messages is in words, 38 per cent in tone of voice, 55 per cent in facial expression — is best treated as suggestive, not a universal law.
3.4 Barriers to Communication
Barriers are anything that distorts a message between sender and receiver. The textbook taxonomy groups them into four families.
| Family | Examples | Where it bites |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic | Different meanings for same word, jargon, ambiguous terms, poor vocabulary | Encoding / decoding |
| Physical | Distance, noise, faulty equipment, time-zone gap | Channel |
| Psychological / Personal | Premature evaluation, prejudice, distrust, fear, emotion | Sender or receiver |
| Organisational | Long scalar chain, status difference, information overload, rigid policies | Structure / culture |
A common NTA distractor offers “language” and asks whether it is a semantic or physical barrier — language is semantic.
3.4.1 Filtering, selective perception, defensiveness
Three frequently-tested specific barriers from Robbins:
- Filtering. A sender deliberately manipulates information so the receiver sees it more favourably. The classic case is a subordinate telling the boss what the boss wants to hear.
- Selective perception. The receiver sees and hears based on their own needs, motivations, experience, background and other personal characteristics.
- Defensiveness. Threatening communication triggers a self-protective response — the receiver attacks, withdraws, or hides from the message rather than processing it.
3.5 Overcoming Barriers — the 7 Cs
Francis J. Bergin’s 7 Cs of effective communication, popularised by Cutlip and Center (cutlipcenter2006?), are the standard checklist.
| C | What it asks |
|---|---|
| Clarity | Is the message simple, single-meaning, jargon-free? |
| Completeness | Does it answer who–what–when–where–why–how? |
| Conciseness | Is every word earning its place? |
| Concreteness | Are there specifics, figures, examples? |
| Consideration | Is it framed from the receiver’s point of view? |
| Courtesy | Is the tone respectful? |
| Correctness | Are facts, language and grammar accurate? |
Other prescriptions: use multiple channels (oral + written for important messages); encourage feedback — ask the receiver to paraphrase; practise active listening (Carl Rogers’s empathic listening); manage information load — neither starve nor flood the receiver; be aware of non-verbal cues.
3.6 Special Models — for the postgraduate-level question
| Model | Originator | One-line idea |
|---|---|---|
| S-M-C-R | David Berlo (1960) | Source–Message–Channel–Receiver, with skill, attitude, knowledge, social system, culture as factors |
| Lasswell’s formula | Harold Lasswell (1948) | “Who says what, in which channel, to whom, with what effect?” |
| Two-step flow | Lazarsfeld & Katz (1955) | Mass communication reaches the audience indirectly through opinion leaders |
3.7 Practice Questions
"Communication is the transfer and understanding of meaning." The definition is most commonly associated with:
View solution
Arrange the following elements of the communication process in the correct order:
| (i) | Encoding |
| (ii) | Channel |
| (iii) | Sender |
| (iv) | Decoding |
| (v) | Receiver |
View solution
A daily production report sent from a foreman to the plant manager is an example of:
View solution
The grapevine is best described as:
View solution
Which of the following is a semantic barrier to communication?
View solution
Match the grapevine pattern with its description (Keith Davis):
| (i) | Single strand | (a) | One person tells everyone |
| (ii) | Gossip | (b) | A → B → C in a chain |
| (iii) | Probability | (c) | A few tell a selected few who tell another selected few |
| (iv) | Cluster | (d) | Information passes randomly |
View solution
Which of the following is not one of the 7 Cs of effective communication?
View solution
"Who says what, in which channel, to whom, with what effect?" is the formula given by:
View solution
- Communication = transfer + understanding of meaning. Barnard: communication is the first function of an executive.
- Seven elements: Sender → Encoding → Message → Channel → Decoding → Receiver → Feedback, with Noise across the loop.
- Four directions: Downward, Upward, Horizontal, Diagonal. Formal vs Grapevine (Davis: single strand, gossip, probability, cluster).
- Four barriers: Semantic, Physical, Psychological, Organisational. Robbins’s specifics: filtering, selective perception, defensiveness.
- Remedies: 7 Cs — Clarity, Completeness, Conciseness, Concreteness, Consideration, Courtesy, Correctness; plus active listening and feedback.
- Models: Shannon–Weaver, Berlo’s S-M-C-R, Lasswell’s “who-what-which-whom-effect”, Lazarsfeld’s two-step flow.