flowchart LR P[Process<br/>Job shop] --- C[Cellular<br/>Group technology] C --- L[Product / Line<br/>Assembly] L --- F[Fixed-position<br/>Shipbuilding] style P fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0 style F fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#AD1457
75 Facility Location and Layout
75.1 Why Location and Layout Matter
A facility decision is strategic, expensive, and difficult to reverse. Location answers where to set up the plant or service centre; layout answers how to arrange the inside of that facility. Both decisions shape long-run cost, capacity and competitiveness.
| Reason | Impact |
|---|---|
| Cost | Wages, real estate, transport, utilities |
| Access to inputs | Raw materials, labour pool, supplier ecosystem |
| Access to markets | Customer proximity, distribution efficiency |
| Regulatory environment | Tax, labour law, environment, FDI |
| Risk | Political, currency, climate |
| Network effects | Cluster benefits (Silicon Valley) |
75.2 Factors Affecting Location
| Factor | Examples |
|---|---|
| Proximity to markets | Reduces logistics cost; speed |
| Proximity to inputs | Raw material, labour, suppliers |
| Transport / Infrastructure | Roads, ports, rail, airports |
| Labour | Skill, cost, union, availability |
| Utilities | Power, water, telecom, internet |
| Regulation and taxation | Excise, GST, SEZ benefits |
| Climate and quality of life | Attracting talent |
| Government incentives | Subsidies, tax holidays, infrastructure |
75.3 Theories of Location
| Theory | Author | Idea |
|---|---|---|
| Weber’s Industrial Location | Alfred Weber (1909) | Minimise total transport cost (raw material + finished good) |
| Central Place Theory | Walter Christaller (1933) | Hierarchy of cities supplying surrounding areas |
| Hoover’s Location Theory | Edgar Hoover | Location depends on procurement, processing, and distribution costs |
Weber identifies three location pulls:
| Pull | Locate near |
|---|---|
| Material-oriented | Raw material (when material loses weight in processing — sugar, cement) |
| Market-oriented | Market (when product gains weight — soft drinks, bread) |
| Footloose / Labour-oriented | Skilled labour (services, IT) |
75.4 Location Selection Methods
| Method | What it does |
|---|---|
| Factor-rating method | Score each candidate on weighted factors; pick highest |
| Centre-of-gravity method | For multi-source logistics — minimises weighted distance |
| Load-distance method | Minimise total distance × load |
| Break-even location analysis | Compare fixed and variable costs across sites |
| Transportation model (LP) | Linear-programming optimisation |
| Simulation | For complex multi-facility networks |
The centre-of-gravity formula:
\[X^* = \frac{\sum L_i \cdot X_i}{\sum L_i}, \quad Y^* = \frac{\sum L_i \cdot Y_i}{\sum L_i}\]
where \(L_i\) is the load to/from location \(i\).
75.5 Plant Layout — Definition and Objectives
Plant layout is the physical arrangement of equipment, workstations, materials, and people in a facility. Objectives:
| Objective | What it captures |
|---|---|
| Minimise material handling | Less movement = less cost |
| Use space efficiently | Fit more in less |
| Improve work flow | Smooth and continuous |
| Provide flexibility | Easy to reconfigure |
| Ensure safety | Reduce accidents |
75.6 Types of Plant Layout
| Type | Description | Best for | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Process / Functional | Group similar processes together | Job shops, low volume, high variety | Hospital wards, machine shops |
| Product / Line | Equipment arranged by product flow | High volume, low variety | Assembly lines |
| Cellular | Grouped families of similar parts in cells | Medium volume / variety | Group technology cells |
| Fixed-position | Product stays put; workers and equipment move to it | Large, immobile products | Shipbuilding, construction |
75.7 Hybrid and Modern Layouts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Cellular manufacturing | Groups of dissimilar machines arranged for a part family |
| U-shaped lines | Lean layout for flexibility and visibility |
| Just-in-Time (JIT) layouts | Minimise inventory; smooth flow |
| Service layouts | Retail (grid, loop, free-flow), warehouse, office |
| Lights-out factory / Smart factory | Automation, IoT, predictive maintenance |
75.8 Indian Location Considerations — SEZs
| Item | What it offers |
|---|---|
| Special Economic Zones (SEZ Act, 2005) | Tax holidays, simplified procedures, exempt from many regulations |
| Industrial corridors | Delhi-Mumbai, Chennai-Bengaluru, Amritsar-Kolkata |
| GIFT City (IFSC) | International financial-services centre |
| State industrial policy | State-specific subsidies, incentives |
| PLI schemes | Production-Linked Incentive — for 14+ sectors |
| Make in India | National manufacturing initiative since 2014 |
75.9 Practice Questions
Weber's industrial-location theory is best summarised as:
View solution
A shipyard, where the product is too large to move and equipment / workers come to it, is best described as a:
View solution
A "process layout" — grouping similar machines together — is best for:
View solution
The centre-of-gravity method is most useful for:
View solution
India's Special Economic Zones Act was enacted in:
View solution
Cellular manufacturing arranges:
View solution
India's "Make in India" initiative was launched in:
View solution
A bottling plant typically locates near the market because the product:
View solution
- Location decisions are strategic, expensive, hard to reverse.
- Weber (1909) — minimise total transport cost. Three pulls: material · market · footloose.
- Methods: factor rating, centre of gravity, load-distance, break-even, LP transportation, simulation.
- Plant layout types: Process · Product/Line · Cellular · Fixed-position.
- Process layout for low-volume / high-variety; line for high-volume / low-variety; fixed-position for very large products; cellular as hybrid.
- India: SEZ Act 2005, Make in India 2014, PLI schemes, GIFT-IFSC, industrial corridors.