flowchart LR E[Ethnocentric<br/>HQ knows best] --> P[Polycentric<br/>Each country unique] P --> R[Regiocentric<br/>Region-based] R --> G[Geocentric<br/>Best person, anywhere] style E fill:#FFEBEE,stroke:#C62828 style P fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#EF6C00 style R fill:#FFF8E1,stroke:#F9A825 style G fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#1B5E20
35 International Human Resource Management
35.1 What is IHRM?
International Human Resource Management (IHRM) is the management of people in multinational enterprises (MNEs) — the worldwide management of human resources, dealing with the unique HR challenges of operating in multiple countries with diverse workforces. The standard reference text is Peter Dowling, Marion Festing and Allen Engle’s International Human Resource Management (dowlingfestingengle2017?).
Dowling et al.’s working definition: IHRM is “the set of activities aimed at managing organisational human resources at international level to achieve organisational objectives and competitive advantage over local and international competitors”.
| Author | Definition | What it foregrounds |
|---|---|---|
| Dowling, Festing & Engle | “The set of activities aimed at managing organisational human resources at international level.” | International scope |
| Morgan | “Influence on three areas — types of HR activity, types of employees, and country of operation — and their interaction.” | Three dimensions |
| Schuler, Dowling & De Cieri | “An integrative framework of strategic-level HR functions inside the multinational enterprise.” | Strategic |
35.1.1 IHRM vs domestic HRM
| Feature | Domestic HRM | IHRM |
|---|---|---|
| Number of HR activities | Standard | Wider — taxation, relocation, expatriate management |
| Type of employees | Generally one nationality | Three types (PCN, HCN, TCN) |
| Geographical span | One country | Multiple countries |
| External influences | National environment | National + international + cultural |
| Risk | Routine | Higher — political, currency, terrorism, family adjustment |
| Personal life | Limited HR involvement | Significant — relocation, schooling, dual-career |
The shorthand for the three employee categories — used widely in the IHRM literature:
| Acronym | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| PCN | Parent-Country National | A US national posted by a US firm to its India subsidiary |
| HCN | Host-Country National | An Indian working in the India subsidiary of a US firm |
| TCN | Third-Country National | A British national posted by a US firm to its India subsidiary |
35.2 Perlmutter’s EPRG Model
Howard Perlmutter (1969) classified the attitudes of MNE headquarters toward foreign operations and people. Later expanded to add Regiocentric — making EPRG (perlmutter1969?).
| Orientation | View | Staffing pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Ethnocentric | Home country knows best | Key positions filled by PCNs |
| Polycentric | Each country is unique; let locals manage | Key positions in subsidiary by HCNs |
| Regiocentric | Manage by regions | Key positions filled by managers from the region |
| Geocentric | Best person regardless of nationality | Truly global mobility |
The geocentric orientation is the textbook ideal — though it requires the firm to invest in standardised HR systems, cross-cultural training and global mobility infrastructure.
35.3 Schuler-Dowling-De Cieri Integrative Framework
Schuler, Dowling and De Cieri (1993) offered the most-cited integrative model of Strategic IHRM (schulerdowling1993?). The framework links four sets of factors:
| Element | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Exogenous factors | Industry characteristics, country, regional factors |
| Endogenous factors | Structure of MNE, life-cycle stage, country of origin, headquarters orientation |
| Strategic MNE components | Inter-unit linkages, internal operations |
| SIHRM issues, functions and policies | HR functions, policies and practices |
35.4 Expatriate Management
An expatriate is an employee posted to work in another country, typically for an extended period. The expatriate cycle is the central operational concern of IHRM.
| Stage | Activity |
|---|---|
| 1 | Strategy and selection — define purpose; pick candidate based on technical and adjustment competence |
| 2 | Pre-departure preparation — cross-cultural training, language, family briefing |
| 3 | Compensation — design package (base, allowances, hardship, COLA, tax equalisation) |
| 4 | Performance management — bi-cultural appraisal, multiple raters |
| 5 | Repatriation — re-integration into home country and home organisation |
| 6 | Career planning — long-term mobility planning |
35.4.1 Why expatriates fail
Empirical research consistently identifies a small number of recurrent reasons for expatriate failure (typically defined as early return or under-performance):
| Cause | Comment |
|---|---|
| Family / spouse adjustment | The single most-cited cause |
| Inability to adapt to host culture | Cultural shock, isolation |
| Manager’s personality issues | Lack of openness, rigidity |
| Inability to cope with greater responsibilities | Job mismatch |
| Lack of motivation for the assignment | Poor selection |
| Technical incompetence | Surprisingly less common |
35.4.2 Compensation approaches
| Approach | What it does | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Going-rate (Market) | Pay based on host-country market | Long-term local hires; HCN-style |
| Balance-sheet (Build-up) | Maintain home-country standard of living + premiums | Short-to-medium-term expatriates |
| Lump-sum / Cafeteria | Single allowance; expatriate manages | Modern, flexible, often combined |
The balance-sheet approach is the most common for traditional expatriate assignments — base salary in home-country terms, plus allowances for housing, COLA, hardship, education, and tax equalisation so the expatriate is not worse off.
35.4.3 Cross-cultural training
Mendenhall and Oddou’s classic four-level training-rigour scheme:
| Level | Methods | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Information-giving | Lectures, books, videos | Short trips |
| Affective | Role-plays, case studies, sensitisation | Medium-length stays |
| Immersion | Field experience, in-country language | Long-term assignments |
| Field training | Live-in pre-assignment | Most demanding postings |
35.4.4 Repatriation
Repatriation is often the least planned part of the cycle — and the part where the most expatriates leave the firm. Issues: career plateau on return, loss of host-country autonomy, social re-integration, financial drop. Effective repatriation programmes plan the next role before the expatriate leaves.
35.5 Adjustment, Culture Shock and the U-Curve
Sverre Lysgaard’s U-curve hypothesis (1955), refined by Black, Mendenhall and Oddou, describes the typical adjustment of an expatriate over time:
| Stage | Mood |
|---|---|
| Honeymoon | Excitement; differences seem charming |
| Culture shock | Frustration; differences seem irritating |
| Adjustment | Functional adaptation; routines stabilise |
| Mastery | Comfort; effective performance |
The W-curve extends the model to include the repatriation curve — the same drop-and-recovery on return.
35.6 IHRM and the Indian MNE
Indian MNEs — TCS, Infosys, Wipro, Tata Motors, Mahindra, Reliance, Bharti Airtel — have built distinctive cost-leader IHRM systems based on a few practices:
- Geocentric leadership at very senior levels; localisation at execution.
- Heavy investment in technical and onboarding training (Infosys’s Mysuru campus is the textbook example).
- Use of short-term assignments and frequent flyers in place of long expatriate postings.
- Significant reverse expatriation — sending HCNs to corporate HQ for cross-pollination.
35.7 Practice Questions
IHRM is best defined as:
View solution
A British national posted by a US-headquartered firm to its India subsidiary is, in IHRM parlance, a:
View solution
Match Perlmutter's orientation with its hallmark:
| (i) | Ethnocentric | (a) | Best person regardless of nationality |
| (ii) | Polycentric | (b) | Region-based management |
| (iii) | Regiocentric | (c) | HQ knows best; PCNs in key roles |
| (iv) | Geocentric | (d) | HCNs run their own subsidiaries |
View solution
The most-cited single cause of expatriate failure in empirical research is:
View solution
The "balance-sheet" approach to expatriate compensation aims to:
View solution
In Lysgaard's U-curve of cross-cultural adjustment, the second stage is:
View solution
Repatriation in IHRM refers to:
View solution
A truly *geocentric* MNE staffs its key roles by:
View solution
- IHRM = HR management in MNEs. Standard text: Dowling, Festing & Engle. Wider scope, three employee types, higher risk, more personal-life involvement.
- Three employee types: PCN (parent-country), HCN (host-country), TCN (third-country).
- Perlmutter’s EPRG: Ethnocentric → Polycentric → Regiocentric → Geocentric. Geocentric = best person regardless of nationality.
- Schuler-Dowling-De Cieri integrative SIHRM framework — exogenous + endogenous + strategic MNE components → SIHRM issues, functions, policies.
- Six-stage expatriate cycle: strategy/selection → preparation → compensation → performance management → repatriation → career planning.
- Most-cited cause of expatriate failure: family / spouse adjustment. Mendenhall & Oddou — four levels of cross-cultural training.
- Compensation: going-rate, balance-sheet (most common), lump-sum. Balance-sheet maintains home standard of living + allowances + tax equalisation.
- U-curve of adjustment: Honeymoon → Culture shock → Adjustment → Mastery. W-curve adds repatriation.