flowchart LR A[Job Analysis<br/>What the job is] --> JE[Job Evaluation<br/>Relative worth of jobs] JE --> WS[Wage Structure<br/>Pay grades + ranges] WS --> C[Compensation<br/>Individual pay decisions] M[(Compensable factors:<br/>Skill · Effort ·<br/>Responsibility ·<br/>Working conditions)] -. inputs to .-> JE style A fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0 style JE fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#EF6C00 style C fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#1B5E20
25 Job Analysis, Evaluation and Compensation Management
25.1 Job Analysis
Job analysis is the systematic process of collecting and analysing information about a job — its duties, responsibilities, working conditions, and the qualifications required to perform it well. The output of job analysis feeds almost every other HR system: recruitment, selection, training, performance appraisal, compensation and safety (dessler2020?).
Edwin B. Flippo’s working definition: “the process of studying and collecting information relating to the operations and responsibilities of a specific job” (flippo1984?). Aswathappa adds that job analysis is “the foundation of HRM — without it, every other HR activity rests on guesswork” (aswathappa2020?).
| Output | What it is | Used for |
|---|---|---|
| Job Description (JD) | Statement of what the job involves — duties, working conditions, reporting relationships | Recruitment, performance appraisal |
| Job Specification (JS) | Statement of what kind of person is required — qualifications, skills, experience, traits | Selection, training-needs analysis |
25.1.1 Methods of job analysis
| Method | How it works | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | Analyst watches the worker | Direct, objective | Unsuitable for mental jobs |
| Interview | Talk to job-holder and supervisor | Detailed insight | Time-consuming; subjective |
| Questionnaire | Structured form | Covers many people quickly | Quality depends on form design |
| Diary / log | Worker records daily activities | Accurate timing data | Burdensome |
| Critical incidents | Effective and ineffective behaviours catalogued | Behaviourally anchored | Uneven coverage |
| Checklist / structured | Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ — McCormick) | Standardised, comparable | Can miss qualitative nuance |
The Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) developed by Ernest McCormick is a quantitative, standardised instrument with around 195 elements grouped into six divisions — information input, mental processes, work output, relationships, job context, other (mccormick1979?).
25.1.2 Job design
Job analysis describes the job as it is; job design asks how the job should be arranged. Four classical approaches:
| Approach | What it does | Anchor |
|---|---|---|
| Job rotation | Move workers across jobs | — |
| Job enlargement | Add tasks at the same level (horizontal loading) | — |
| Job enrichment | Add depth, autonomy, decision rights (vertical loading) | Frederick Herzberg |
| Job characteristics model | Five core dimensions affect motivation | Hackman & Oldham (1976) |
Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model is the most-tested job-design framework. The five core dimensions — Skill Variety, Task Identity, Task Significance, Autonomy, Feedback — combine into a Motivating Potential Score (MPS):
\[MPS = \frac{(SV + TI + TS)}{3} \times A \times F\]
Where the three dimensions of meaningfulness (SV, TI, TS) are averaged, and Autonomy and Feedback enter multiplicatively (hackmanoldham1976?).
25.2 Job Evaluation
Job evaluation is the systematic process of determining the relative worth of jobs in an organisation. It is the bridge between job analysis (what the job is) and compensation (what the job pays). Wendell French: job evaluation is “a process of determining the relative worth of various jobs of the organisation, so that differential wages may be paid to jobs of different worth” (frenchwendell1990?).
25.2.1 Four classical methods
Job-evaluation methods divide neatly into non-quantitative and quantitative.
| Method | Type | How it works | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranking | Non-quantitative | Jobs ranked from highest to lowest by overall worth | Simple, cheap | Subjective; impractical for many jobs |
| Job grading / classification | Non-quantitative | Each job placed in a pre-defined grade with a description | Used in government (Pay Commission, US GS scale) | Borderline jobs hard to place |
| Factor comparison | Quantitative | Jobs compared factor by factor (skill, mental effort, physical effort, responsibility, working conditions); ranked on each | Detailed; pay-rate-based | Complex to administer |
| Point method | Quantitative | Compensable factors identified, each given a weight in points; jobs scored on each factor | Most defensible; most widely used | Setting up the system is laborious |
The point method is the dominant approach in modern compensation practice. Hay Group’s Hay Plan — used by tens of thousands of organisations globally — is a celebrated point system with three universal factors: know-how, problem-solving, accountability (hay1984?).
25.3 Compensation Management
Compensation management is the design and administration of what employees are paid — in cash, kind and benefits — for the work they do.
25.3.1 Components of compensation
| Component | What it is |
|---|---|
| Direct compensation | Cash — basic pay, allowances (DA, HRA), variable / incentive pay, bonuses |
| Indirect compensation (benefits) | Provident fund, gratuity, ESI, medical insurance, leave encashment, retirement |
| Long-term incentives | ESOPs, RSUs, deferred bonus, performance shares |
| Non-financial | Recognition, status, career growth, flexibility, work-life balance |
25.3.2 Pay-determination factors
Robbins lists six families of factors that drive pay decisions (robbinsjudge2018?):
| Family | Examples |
|---|---|
| Internal equity | Job evaluation; relative worth within firm |
| External equity | Market salary surveys; competitive position |
| Individual equity | Performance, seniority, skill |
| Organisational | Ability to pay, business strategy, life-cycle stage |
| Labour-market | Demand–supply, scarcity premiums |
| Statutory and regulatory | Minimum wage, payment of bonus, equal remuneration |
25.3.3 Compensation strategies
| Posture | Description | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Lead the market | Pay above the median | Attracts top talent; raises cost |
| Match the market | Pay at the median | Standard, balanced |
| Lag the market | Pay below the median, often with high variable | Lower cost; risk of attrition |
25.3.4 Performance-linked / variable pay
The shift from fixed to variable compensation has been a major trend over the past two decades. Common forms — individual incentives, team bonuses, gain-sharing (Scanlon, Rucker plans), profit-sharing, ESOPs and RSUs.
25.3.5 Compensation in India — the statutory backbone
| Earlier Act | What it covered |
|---|---|
| Minimum Wages Act, 1948 | Statutory minimum wage; floor wage |
| Payment of Wages Act, 1936 | Timely, full payment of wages; permitted deductions |
| Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 | Equal pay for equal work, irrespective of sex |
| Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 | Annual bonus for eligible employees |
The Code on Wages, 2019 consolidates the four into a single statute. Other India-specific items: Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 (now in Code on Social Security), Provident Fund (EPF) under EPF & MP Act 1952, ESI Act 1948 — most consolidated into the Code on Social Security 2020.
The Pay Commissions of the Government of India set salaries for central-government employees. The 7th Pay Commission (Justice A.K. Mathur) is the latest implemented (effective from 1 January 2016); the 8th Pay Commission has been announced but its recommendations are not yet implemented as of 2026.
25.4 Practice Questions
A "Job Specification" describes:
View solution
The Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) — a structured, quantitative job-analysis instrument — was developed by:
View solution
Hackman & Oldham's Job Characteristics Model identifies how many core job dimensions?
View solution
Match the job-evaluation method with its type:
| (i) | Ranking | (a) | Quantitative |
| (ii) | Job grading / classification | (b) | Quantitative |
| (iii) | Factor comparison | (c) | Non-quantitative |
| (iv) | Point method | (d) | Non-quantitative |
View solution
The Hay Plan, a widely used point-based job-evaluation system, uses three universal factors. They are:
View solution
A firm that consciously pays above the market median to attract top talent is following which compensation posture?
View solution
India's Code on Wages, 2019 consolidates which of the following older statutes?
View solution
The latest Pay Commission whose recommendations have been implemented for central-government employees in India is the:
View solution
- Job analysis = systematic study of a job. Two outputs: Job Description (what the job is) + Job Specification (what the person needs).
- Methods: Observation, Interview, Questionnaire, Diary, Critical incidents, PAQ (McCormick).
- Job design approaches: Rotation, Enlargement (horizontal), Enrichment (vertical — Herzberg), Job Characteristics Model (Hackman & Oldham). Five core dimensions: SV, TI, TS, A, F.
- Job evaluation = relative worth of jobs. Four classical methods: Ranking, Grading (non-quantitative); Factor Comparison, Point method (quantitative).
- Hay Plan’s three universal factors: Know-how, Problem-solving, Accountability.
- Compensation components: direct (cash) + indirect (benefits) + LTI + non-financial.
- Three pay-strategy postures: lead, match, lag the market.
- India: Code on Wages, 2019 consolidates Minimum Wages, Payment of Wages, Equal Remuneration, Payment of Bonus. Latest implemented Pay Commission: 7th (Mathur, 2016).