flowchart LR
S[1. Segmentation<br/>Divide market<br/>into groups] --> T[2. Targeting<br/>Choose attractive<br/>segments]
T --> P[3. Positioning<br/>Differentiate<br/>offer]
P --> MIX[4. Marketing Mix<br/>4 Ps]
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
59 Market Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning
59.1 The STP Framework
STP — Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning — is the strategic heart of modern marketing. Coined by Wendell R. Smith (Journal of Marketing, 1956) — “Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation” — and standardised by Philip Kotler as the bridge between marketing analysis and the marketing mix.
59.2 Market Segmentation
Market Segmentation = the process of dividing a heterogeneous market into smaller, more homogeneous groups of consumers who share similar needs, characteristics or behaviours, and who require separate marketing strategies or mixes.
| Author | Definition |
|---|---|
| Wendell R. Smith (1956) | “Viewing a heterogeneous market as a number of smaller homogeneous markets in response to differing product preferences.” |
| Philip Kotler | “Dividing a market into distinct groups of buyers who have distinct needs, characteristics, or behaviour and who might require separate products or marketing programmes.” |
| Stanton | “The process of dividing the total heterogeneous market for a good or service into several segments, each of which tends to be homogeneous in significant respects.” |
| Cravens | “The identification of customer groups within the market that have similar response behaviour.” |
59.3 Why Segment?
- Better customer understanding.
- Higher customer satisfaction through tailored offers.
- Efficient resource allocation.
- Identification of growth opportunities.
- Sharper competitive positioning.
- Better channel and pricing decisions.
- Higher ROI on marketing spend.
- Discovery of unmet needs.
59.4 Bases of Segmentation
| Basis | Variables | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic | Country, region, city size, climate, urban/rural | India urban vs rural; metros vs Tier 2/3 |
| Demographic | Age, gender, income, occupation, education, family size, religion | Millennials vs Gen Z; SEC A/B/C; women’s segment |
| Psychographic | Lifestyle, personality, values (AIO) | LOHAS · VALS (Mitchell) |
| Behavioural | Usage rate, occasion, benefits sought, loyalty, attitude | Heavy/light user; brand loyal; Diwali shopper |
| Hybrid / Geo-demographic | Combinations | Mosaic, ACORN, PRIZM, India’s IRS |
59.4.1 Demographic Segmentation Details
- Age — children, teens, young adults, middle-aged, seniors.
- Gender — male, female, non-binary, family decisions.
- Income — SEC (Socio-Economic Classification: A1, A2, B, C, D, E in India).
- Occupation — white-collar, blue-collar, professional, student.
- Education — schooling, graduate, post-graduate.
- Family Life Cycle — single, newlywed, full-nest I/II/III, empty-nest, solitary.
- Religion · Ethnicity · Nationality · Generation.
Stages: Bachelor · Newly Married · Full Nest I (young children) · Full Nest II (older children) · Full Nest III (older children with grown ones) · Empty Nest I (still working) · Empty Nest II (retired) · Solitary Survivor. Adopted widely in consumer behaviour research.
59.4.2 Psychographic Segmentation
- AIO — Activities, Interests, Opinions (Plummer 1974).
- VALS (Values, Attitudes, Lifestyles) — Arnold Mitchell, SRI International (1978); revised VALS2 (1989).
- VALS Segments: Innovators · Thinkers · Achievers · Experiencers · Believers · Strivers · Makers · Survivors.
- LOHAS — Lifestyle of Health and Sustainability.
- PRIZM / Claritas — geo-demographic-psychographic.
- Indian context — MOSAIC India.
59.4.3 Behavioural Segmentation
- Occasion — daily, festive, vacation, business.
- Benefits sought — Yankelovich’s benefit segmentation (1964).
- Usage rate — heavy, medium, light (80-20 / Pareto).
- User status — non-user, ex-user, potential, first-time, regular.
- Loyalty status — hardcore, split, shifting, switchers.
- Buyer-readiness stage — unaware, aware, informed, interested, desirous, intending to buy.
- Attitude — enthusiastic, positive, indifferent, negative, hostile.
59.4.4 B2B / Industrial Segmentation
- Demographics — industry, size, location.
- Operating variables — technology, user status, capability.
- Purchasing approach — purchasing function, power structure, criteria.
- Situational factors — urgency, application, order size.
- Personal characteristics — buyer-seller similarity, attitudes to risk.
- Bonoma-Shapiro nested model (1984) — 5 nested levels.
59.5 Criteria for Effective Segmentation
- Measurable — size, purchasing power can be measured.
- Substantial — large enough to be profitable.
- Accessible — can be reached and served.
- Differentiable — distinguishable from other segments.
- Actionable — feasible to design effective programmes.
(Some texts add Stable — sufficient durability.)
59.6 Levels of Market Segmentation
| Level | Description |
|---|---|
| Mass Marketing | One product, one programme, all buyers (Coca-Cola pre-1980s) |
| Segment Marketing | Distinct programmes for distinct segments (Maruti for different income groups) |
| Niche Marketing | Narrow segment with specific needs (Royal Enfield, Apple’s high-end) |
| Local / Micro Marketing | Local-area customisation (regional brand variations) |
| Individual / One-to-One | Mass customisation, personalisation (Amazon recommendations, Dell BTO) |
59.7 Process of Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning
- Identify bases for segmenting the market.
- Develop profiles of resulting segments.
- Evaluate segment attractiveness.
- Select target segment(s).
- Develop positioning for each target segment.
- Develop marketing mix for each target segment.
59.8 Targeting / Market Coverage
Target Marketing = the process of evaluating each market segment’s attractiveness and selecting one or more segments to enter. Kotler identifies five target-market coverage strategies.
| Strategy | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Single-Segment Concentration | One segment with one product | Rolex (luxury watches) |
| Selective / Multi-Segment Specialisation | Multiple segments with different products | P&G’s multiple brands |
| Product Specialisation | One product for multiple segments | Microscopes for many user types |
| Market Specialisation | Multiple products for one segment | Servicing universities |
| Full Market Coverage | All products to all segments — undifferentiated or differentiated | Coca-Cola, HUL |
59.9 Three Marketing Strategies by Segment Coverage
| Strategy | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Undifferentiated (Mass) | Single mix for entire market | Coca-Cola pre-1980 |
| Differentiated (Multi-segment) | Multiple mixes for multiple segments | HUL’s Lifebuoy + Dove + Lux |
| Concentrated (Niche) | Single mix for narrow segment | Rolls-Royce, Ferrari |
| Micromarketing / Customised | Individualised mix | Bespoke tailoring, Dell |
59.10 Evaluating Segments — Attractiveness
- Size and growth rate of segment.
- Structural attractiveness — Porter’s 5 Forces in that segment.
- Profitability potential.
- Company objectives and resources fit.
- Competition intensity in segment.
- Distribution and channel considerations.
- Risk profile.
59.11 Positioning
Positioning is the act of designing the company’s offering and image so that it occupies a distinct and valued place in the target customer’s mind. The classic text is Al Ries and Jack Trout’s Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind (1981).
| Author | Definition |
|---|---|
| Al Ries & Jack Trout (1981) | “Positioning is not what you do to a product. Positioning is what you do to the mind of the prospect.” |
| Kotler | “Designing the company’s offer and image so that they occupy a meaningful and distinctive competitive position in the target customers’ minds.” |
| Aaker | “The part of the brand identity and value proposition that is to be actively communicated to a target audience.” |
| Wind | “The place a product occupies in a given market, as perceived by the relevant group of customers.” |
59.11.1 Ries-Trout’s Insight
Al Ries and Jack Trout — “In the over-communicated society of today, the only hope of scoring big is to be selective, to concentrate on narrow targets, to practise segmentation. In a word: positioning.”
59.12 Positioning Strategies
- Attribute / Feature positioning — e.g., Volvo (safety).
- Benefit positioning — e.g., Colgate (decay prevention).
- Use / Application positioning — e.g., Cadbury (gift).
- User positioning — e.g., Pampers (mothers of infants).
- Competitor positioning — e.g., Avis (“We try harder” #2 vs Hertz).
- Product Category positioning — e.g., 7-Up (“Uncola”).
- Quality / Price positioning — e.g., Walmart (low price); Rolex (high end).
- Cultural Symbol positioning — Hallmark cards, Patanjali.
- Hybrid / Multi-attribute positioning.
59.13 Differentiation
Differentiation creates the basis for positioning. Kotler identifies five dimensions:
| Dimension | Examples |
|---|---|
| Product | Features, performance, durability, design |
| Service | Delivery, installation, training, maintenance |
| Channel | Coverage, expertise, performance |
| People / Personnel | Competence, courtesy, credibility, reliability |
| Image / Brand | Symbols, atmosphere, events, written/audiovisual media |
59.14 Perceptual / Positioning Maps
- Two-dimensional plot of competing brands on key attributes (e.g., price × quality).
- Helps identify positioning gaps.
- Reveals competitive clusters and “ideal points”.
- Built using consumer-survey data + multidimensional scaling.
59.15 Brand Positioning Statement
Kotler-Keller template:
“To [target segment] who [need], our brand is the [product category] that provides [key benefit] because [reason to believe].”
Example: “To busy urban professionals who value health, Amul Pro is the chocolate milk drink that delivers complete daily nutrition because it is fortified with 21 essential vitamins and minerals.”
59.16 Repositioning
Repositioning = changing the position of a product in the consumer’s mind, usually due to market changes, competitive moves, or product life-cycle stage.
- Tangible (Real) repositioning — change in product.
- Symbolic repositioning — change in image, not product.
- Augmented — adding services/features.
- De-positioning — change consumer perception of competitor.
- Famous Indian repositioning: Mountain Dew (action → “Dar ke aage jeet hai”), Bournvita (“Tayyari Jeet Ki”), Cadbury Dairy Milk (kids → all-occasion).
59.17 Errors in Positioning — Kotler
- Underpositioning — buyers have only a vague idea of the brand.
- Overpositioning — too narrow image, hides breadth.
- Confused Positioning — too many claims dilute clarity.
- Doubtful Positioning — claims not believable.
59.18 USP — Unique Selling Proposition
USP — Unique Selling Proposition — coined by Rosser Reeves (Ted Bates agency, Reality in Advertising, 1961). Three criteria: (1) Each ad must say “Buy this product, you will get this specific benefit”; (2) The benefit must be one competitors cannot offer; (3) It must be strong enough to move millions.
59.19 Positioning Maps and Multidimensional Scaling
Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) is a quantitative technique to construct perceptual maps from consumer similarity / dissimilarity ratings. Pioneered by Joseph Kruskal (1964) at Bell Labs.
59.20 Brand Positioning Models
- Aaker’s Brand Identity Prism (1996) — Product · Organisation · Person · Symbol.
- Kapferer’s Brand Identity Prism.
- Keller’s Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) Pyramid (2001): Salience · Performance · Imagery · Judgements · Feelings · Resonance.
- Brand Resonance Pyramid (Keller).
- Y&R BrandAsset Valuator (BAV).
59.21 STP in India — Famous Cases
- Maruti Suzuki — segmented by income (Alto, Wagon-R, Swift, Baleno, Ciaz, S-Cross).
- HUL — Lifebuoy (mass), Dove (premium), Pears (super-premium); Lux (women).
- ITC’s Aashirvaad — premium atta segment.
- Patanjali — Ayurvedic + price-conscious positioning.
- Royal Enfield — niche cruiser-motorcycle segment.
- OYO — budget hotels segment.
- Tata Nano — bottom-of-the-pyramid (Prahalad).
- MakeMyTrip / RedBus — geographic + behavioural.
- boAt — youth + audio + affordable luxury.
59.22 Modern Trends in STP
- Micro-segmentation with big data and AI.
- Hyper-personalisation at scale (segment of one).
- Behavioural cohort segmentation (clickstream, app analytics).
- Lookalike / propensity modelling.
- Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD) segmentation — Clayton Christensen.
- Tribes / Communities as segments (Seth Godin).
- Values-based segmentation — ESG-aware consumers.
- Real-time contextual targeting.
- Privacy-first segmentation in cookieless world.
- Generative-AI–driven persona creation.
- Emotional / sentiment segmentation.
- Omnichannel positioning consistency.
59.23 Practice Questions
The concept of market segmentation was introduced in 1956 by:
View solution
*Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind* (1981) was by:
View solution
Income, age and gender are examples of which segmentation basis?
View solution
VALS (Values, Attitudes, Lifestyles) framework was developed in 1978 by:
View solution
Kotler's criteria for effective segmentation include all EXCEPT:
View solution
"Unique Selling Proposition" (USP) was coined by:
View solution
Which is the broadest level of market segmentation?
View solution
Kotler's five dimensions of differentiation include all EXCEPT:
View solution
"Too many claims about a brand dilute its image" — this is:
View solution
"We try harder" (Avis vs Hertz) is an example of:
View solution
The "Nested Approach" to industrial market segmentation (1984) was proposed by:
View solution
"Family Life Cycle" segmentation was developed in 1966 by:
View solution
A "Concentrated" marketing strategy is most suitable for:
View solution
Volvo's positioning is based primarily on:
View solution
"Benefit segmentation" was developed in 1964 by:
View solution
A "perceptual map" typically plots:
View solution
Mountain Dew's shift from action to "Darr ke aage jeet hai" is an example of:
View solution
"Jobs-to-be-Done" segmentation is associated with:
View solution
Keller's CBBE Pyramid has at its apex:
View solution
Match the segmentation basis with its variable:
| (i) | Geographic | (a) | Loyalty |
| (ii) | Demographic | (b) | Region |
| (iii) | Psychographic | (c) | Income |
| (iv) | Behavioural | (d) | Lifestyle |
View solution
59.23.1 Advanced Format Questions
A: Effective segmentation requires segments to be measurable, accessible, substantial, differentiable, actionable.
R: Kotler's MASDA framework provides these criteria.
View solution
Bases of segmentation: (i) Demographic. (ii) Geographic. (iii) Psychographic. (iv) Behavioural.
View solution
Targeting strategies: (i) Undifferentiated. (ii) Differentiated. (iii) Concentrated. (iv) Micromarketing.
View solution
59.24 Quick Recall
- STP = Segmentation · Targeting · Positioning.
- Origin — Wendell R. Smith (JM 1956) — coined market segmentation.
- Definitions: Smith · Kotler · Stanton · Cravens.
- 8 benefits of segmentation.
- 5 bases: Geographic · Demographic · Psychographic · Behavioural · Hybrid.
- Demographic variables: Age · Gender · Income (SEC A1-E) · Occupation · Education · Family Life Cycle (Wells-Gubar 1966) · Religion · Generation.
- Psychographic: AIO (Plummer 1974) · VALS (Mitchell SRI 1978; VALS2 1989) · LOHAS · PRIZM · MOSAIC.
- Behavioural: Occasion · Benefit (Yankelovich 1964) · Usage rate · User status · Loyalty · Buyer-readiness · Attitude.
- B2B: Bonoma-Shapiro nested model (1984) — 5 levels.
- Kotler’s effective segmentation criteria (5): Measurable · Substantial · Accessible · Differentiable · Actionable.
- Levels (Kotler): Mass · Segment · Niche · Local/Micro · Individual / One-to-One.
- STP process (6 steps): Identify bases → Profile segments → Evaluate → Select → Position → Mix.
- Targeting (Kotler 5): Single-Segment Concentration · Selective · Product Specialisation · Market Specialisation · Full Market Coverage.
- 3 classic targeting strategies: Undifferentiated (Mass) · Differentiated (Multi-segment) · Concentrated (Niche); plus Micromarketing.
- Segment evaluation: size/growth · 5 Forces · profitability · resource fit · competition · distribution · risk.
- Positioning — Ries & Trout (1981) Battle for Your Mind.
- Positioning bases: Attribute · Benefit · Use · User · Competitor · Category · Quality/Price · Cultural symbol · Hybrid.
- Differentiation dimensions (Kotler 5): Product · Service · Channel · People · Image.
- Perceptual maps; MDS — Kruskal (1964).
- Brand positioning statement template (Kotler-Keller).
- Repositioning: Tangible · Symbolic · Augmented · De-positioning.
- Positioning errors (Kotler 4): Under · Over · Confused · Doubtful.
- USP — Rosser Reeves (1961) Reality in Advertising.
- Positioning models: Aaker · Keller’s CBBE Pyramid (Salience → Performance/Imagery → Judgements/Feelings → Resonance) · Kapferer · Y&R BAV.
- Indian examples: Maruti · HUL · ITC Aashirvaad · Patanjali · Royal Enfield · OYO · Tata Nano · MakeMyTrip · boAt.
- Modern trends: micro-segmentation with AI · hyper-personalisation · behavioural cohorts · lookalike models · JTBD (Christensen) · tribes (Godin) · values-based · real-time contextual · privacy-first · gen-AI personas · sentiment segmentation · omnichannel positioning.