flowchart TB A[Artefacts<br/>Visible — what we see] --> V[Espoused Values<br/>Stated — what we say] V --> U[Underlying Assumptions<br/>Invisible — what we actually believe] style A fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#AD1457 style V fill:#FFF8E1,stroke:#F9A825 style U fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0
19 Organizational Culture and Climate
19.1 What is Organisational Culture?
Organisational culture is the system of shared meanings held by members of an organisation that distinguishes the organisation from others. The classroom shorthand: “the way we do things around here.” It is how a Tata company is recognisably different from a Reliance company even when both have similar org charts and financials.
Edgar Schein, the discipline’s founder, defines it as “a pattern of shared basic assumptions that the group learned as it solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, that has worked well enough to be considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems” (schein2010?). Stephen Robbins offers the more compact textbook version: “a system of shared meaning held by members that distinguishes the organisation from other organisations” (robbinsjudge2018?).
| Author | Definition | What it foregrounds |
|---|---|---|
| Edgar Schein | “Pattern of shared basic assumptions learned in solving problems of adaptation and integration.” | Learning, depth |
| Stephen Robbins | “System of shared meaning held by members that distinguishes the organisation.” | Meaning, distinctiveness |
| Geert Hofstede | “The collective programming of the mind which distinguishes one organisation from another.” | Mental programming |
19.1.1 Seven primary characteristics (Robbins)
| Characteristic | What it captures |
|---|---|
| Innovation and risk-taking | How much employees are encouraged to be innovative |
| Attention to detail | How much precision and analysis is expected |
| Outcome orientation | Focus on results vs the techniques to achieve them |
| People orientation | Effect of decisions on people inside the firm |
| Team orientation | Work organised around teams rather than individuals |
| Aggressiveness | How aggressive and competitive members are |
| Stability | Maintaining the status quo vs growth |
19.2 Schein’s Three Levels of Culture
The most-used framework in OB. Already met in topic 14; here is the deeper treatment (schein2010?).
| Level | What it is | Visibility | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artefacts | Visible structures, behaviours, language, dress, office design | Easy to see, hard to interpret | Open-plan office, casual dress, T-shirt with the logo |
| Espoused values | Stated strategies, philosophies, mission, code of ethics | Explicit | “Customer first” written on the wall |
| Underlying assumptions | Unspoken, taken-for-granted beliefs | Invisible | “We never lie to the customer” — held without discussion |
A culture is strong when the underlying assumptions are deeply held, broadly shared and consistent with the espoused values; weak when artefacts and values diverge from underlying behaviour.
19.3 Strong vs Weak Cultures
| Feature | Strong | Weak |
|---|---|---|
| Sharing | Most members share core values | Values held by a few |
| Intensity | Held with conviction | Held lightly |
| Consistency | Espoused values match underlying behaviour | Mismatch between values and behaviour |
| Effect | Predictable behaviour, lower turnover, can be a source of advantage | Variable behaviour, high turnover, easier to change |
A strong culture is not always good. If the dominant assumptions become out of step with the environment (Kodak, Nokia), strength becomes rigidity.
19.4 Types of Organisational Culture
19.4.1 Charles Handy’s four cultures
Charles Handy identified four cultural archetypes — borrowing names from Greek mythology (handy1993?):
| Culture | Symbol | Description | Common in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power (Zeus) | Spider’s web | Power radiates from a central figure; few rules | Small firms, family businesses |
| Role (Apollo) | Greek temple — pillars | Bureaucratic; defined roles, procedures | Government, large corporations |
| Task (Athena) | Net | Project-based; expertise rules | Consulting, R&D firms |
| Person (Dionysus) | Cluster of stars | Individuals are the centre; minimal structure | Law partnerships, doctors’ groups |
19.4.2 Cameron and Quinn’s Competing Values Framework (OCAI)
Kim Cameron and Robert Quinn’s Competing Values Framework uses two axes — flexibility vs stability and internal vs external focus — to derive four culture types, measured by the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) (cameronquinn2011?):
| Type | Axes | Focus | Cue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clan | Flexibility + Internal | Family-like, mentor leadership | Loyalty and tradition |
| Adhocracy | Flexibility + External | Dynamic, entrepreneurial | Innovation and risk |
| Hierarchy | Stability + Internal | Formal, structured | Predictability |
| Market | Stability + External | Results-oriented, competitive | Goal achievement |
19.5 How Culture is Created and Sustained
Schein identifies founders as the original source of culture — Tata’s J.N. Tata, Infosys’s N.R. Narayana Murthy, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos. Once formed, culture is sustained through three forces (Robbins):
| Force | How it keeps culture alive |
|---|---|
| Selection | Hiring people whose values fit |
| Top management | Modelling and rewarding the values |
| Socialisation | Onboarding new members into “how we do things” |
19.5.2 Transmitters of culture
Stories, rituals, material symbols and language. Tata’s stories about looking after employees during the 26/11 attacks; Infosys’s daily morning meeting; the dress code at McKinsey; the term “Googler”.
19.6 Functions and Dysfunctions of Culture
| Functions | Dysfunctions |
|---|---|
| Provides identity and boundary | Resistant to change |
| Generates commitment beyond self-interest | May reject diverse hires |
| Enhances stability of the social system | Can fuel groupthink and rigidity |
| Acts as a control mechanism — guides behaviour | May tolerate unethical sub-cultures |
19.7 Organisational Climate
If culture is the deep, slow-moving DNA of the organisation, climate is the visible, current weather. Climate is the shared perception members have of the organisation’s policies, practices and procedures as they exist now (schneiderbartelhastrom2013?).
| Feature | Culture | Climate |
|---|---|---|
| Depth | Underlying assumptions and values | Surface perceptions |
| Time horizon | Stable, slow to change | Variable, can shift in months |
| Discipline | Anthropology, sociology | Industrial / organisational psychology |
| Measurement | Qualitative (interviews, observation) | Quantitative (surveys) |
| Examples | “We always tell the customer the truth” | “My boss recognised my work last week” |
19.7.1 Litwin and Stringer’s six climate dimensions
George Litwin and Robert Stringer’s six-factor model is widely tested in Indian OB texts (litwinstringer1968?):
| Dimension | What it captures |
|---|---|
| Structure | Sense of constraint, rules, red tape |
| Standards | Emphasis on quality and high performance |
| Responsibility | Feeling of being one’s own boss |
| Reward | Equity and adequacy of rewards |
| Support | Helpfulness of managers and peers |
| Commitment | Pride and loyalty to the organisation |
A positive climate is associated with higher performance and lower turnover; the climate is largely shaped by leadership style.
19.8 Practice Questions
In Edgar Schein's three-level model of organisational culture, the visible level is:
View solution
In Charles Handy's classification, a culture symbolised by a "Greek temple" with defined roles and procedures is:
View solution
Match Cameron & Quinn's culture types with their orientation:
| (i) | Clan | (a) | Stability + External — results-oriented |
| (ii) | Adhocracy | (b) | Flexibility + Internal — family-like |
| (iii) | Hierarchy | (c) | Flexibility + External — innovative |
| (iv) | Market | (d) | Stability + Internal — formal |
View solution
A "strong" organisational culture is one in which:
View solution
In Van Maanen and Schein's socialisation framework, the stage at which a new employee meets the reality of the organisation and tests its values is:
View solution
Compared with culture, organisational climate is best characterised as:
View solution
Which is not one of Litwin and Stringer's six climate dimensions?
View solution
Robbins lists three forces that sustain organisational culture. They are:
View solution
- Culture = “the way we do things around here”; system of shared meaning (Robbins) / basic assumptions (Schein).
- Robbins’s seven characteristics: innovation, attention to detail, outcome orientation, people, team, aggressiveness, stability.
- Schein’s three levels: Artefacts → Espoused values → Underlying assumptions.
- Strong culture = high sharing + intensity + consistency; useful but can become rigid.
- Handy’s four: Power (Zeus) · Role (Apollo) · Task (Athena) · Person (Dionysus).
- Cameron-Quinn (OCAI) four types on flexibility/stability × internal/external: Clan · Adhocracy · Hierarchy · Market.
- Culture is sustained by Selection · Top management · Socialisation. Socialisation stages (Van Maanen-Schein): Pre-arrival → Encounter → Metamorphosis.
- Climate vs Culture: surface vs deep; quantitative survey vs qualitative ethnography. Litwin-Stringer’s six dimensions: Structure, Standards, Responsibility, Reward, Support, Commitment.
19.5.1 Socialisation — Van Maanen and Schein’s three stages